Login / Signup

Population-based age adjustment tables for use in occupational hearing conservation programs.

Gregory A FlammeKristy K DeitersMark R StephensonChrista L ThemannWilliam J MurphyDavid C ByrneDavid G GoldfarbRachel A Zeig-OwensCharles HallDavid J PrezantJames E Cone
Published in: International journal of audiology (2019)
Objective: In occupational hearing conservation programmes, age adjustments may be used to subtract expected age effects. Adjustments used in the U.S. came from a small dataset and overlooked important demographic factors, ages, and stimulus frequencies. The present study derived a set of population-based age adjustment tables and validated them using a database of exposed workers.Design: Cross-sectional population-based study and retrospective longitudinal cohort study for validation.Study sample: Data from the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (unweighted n = 9937) were used to produce these tables. Male firefighters and emergency medical service workers (76,195 audiograms) were used for validation.Results: Cross-sectional trends implied less change with age than assumed in current U.S. regulations. Different trends were observed among people identifying with non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity. Four age adjustment tables (age range: 18-85) were developed (women or men; non-Hispanic Black or other race/ethnicity). Validation outcomes showed that the population-based tables matched median longitudinal changes in hearing sensitivity well.Conclusions: These population-based tables provide a suitable replacement for those implemented in current U.S. regulations. These tables address a broader range of worker ages, account for differences in hearing sensitivity across race/ethnicity categories, and have been validated for men using longitudinal data.
Keyphrases
  • cross sectional
  • mental health
  • type diabetes
  • public health
  • hearing loss
  • emergency medical
  • adipose tissue
  • big data
  • adverse drug