Rapid-cycle designs to adapt interventions for COVID-19 in safety-net healthcare systems.
Chelsey R SchlechterThomas J ReeseJennifer WirthBryan GibsonKensaku KawamotoTracey SiaperasAlan PruhsCourtney Pariera DinkinsYue ZhangMichael FriedrichsStephanie GeorgeCho Y LamJoni H PierceEmerson P BorsatoRyan C CorniaLeticia StevensAnna MartinezRichard L BradshawKimberly A KaphingstRachel HessGuilherme Del FiolDavid W WetterPublished in: Translational behavioral medicine (2023)
Racial/ethnic minority, low socioeconomic status, and rural populations are disproportionately affected by COVID-19. Developing and evaluating interventions to address COVID-19 testing and vaccination among these populations are crucial to improving health inequities. The purpose of this paper is to describe the application of a rapid-cycle design and adaptation process from an ongoing trial to address COVID-19 among safety-net healthcare system patients. The rapid-cycle design and adaptation process included: (a) assessing context and determining relevant models/frameworks; (b) determining core and modifiable components of interventions; and (c) conducting iterative adaptations using Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. PDSA cycles included: Plan. Gather information from potential adopters/implementers (e.g., Community Health Center [CHC] staff/patients) and design initial interventions; Do. Implement interventions in single CHC or patient cohort; Study. Examine process, outcome, and context data (e.g., infection rates); and, Act. If necessary, refine interventions based on process and outcome data, then disseminate interventions to other CHCs and patient cohorts. Seven CHC systems with 26 clinics participated in the trial. Rapid-cycle, PDSA-based adaptations were made to adapt to evolving COVID-19-related needs. Near real-time data used for adaptation included data on infection hot spots, CHC capacity, stakeholder priorities, local/national policies, and testing/vaccine availability. Adaptations included those to study design, intervention content, and intervention cohorts. Decision-making included multiple stakeholders (e.g., State Department of Health, Primary Care Association, CHCs, patients, researchers). Rapid-cycle designs may improve the relevance and timeliness of interventions for CHCs and other settings that provide care to populations experiencing health inequities, and for rapidly evolving healthcare challenges such as COVID-19.
Keyphrases
- healthcare
- coronavirus disease
- sars cov
- physical activity
- primary care
- end stage renal disease
- public health
- ejection fraction
- randomized controlled trial
- newly diagnosed
- chronic kidney disease
- peritoneal dialysis
- prognostic factors
- magnetic resonance imaging
- machine learning
- clinical trial
- study protocol
- computed tomography
- mental health
- high intensity
- respiratory syndrome coronavirus
- palliative care
- patient reported outcomes
- patient reported
- risk assessment
- phase iii
- pain management
- sensitive detection
- open label