Login / Signup

A comparison between carbon footprint of water production facilities in the Canary Islands: groundwater resources vs. seawater desalination.

Noelia Cruz-PérezJuan C SantamartaIsabel Gamallo-PazJesica Rodríguez-MartínAlejandro García-Gil
Published in: Sustainable water resources management (2022)
The Canary Islands have a water culture tied to the exploitation of their groundwater by means of wells and water galleries. However, the growth of tourism, the increase in the local population and the development of agriculture have led to the emergence of new ways of obtaining water, such as the desalination of seawater. The presence of these desalination plants covers the entire archipelago except for the island of La Palma, and sometimes they function as a complement to water needs, while in other cases they are the only source of drinking water available. To study the environmental impact of the production of drinking water through the exploitation of the aquifer and the desalination of seawater, the carbon footprint methodology was used following the guidelines of the GHG Protocol. The result has shown that seawater installations have the largest carbon footprint, mainly due to the high electricity consumption in the islands and the electricity mix of the archipelago which, as it does not rely entirely on renewable energy sources, increases CO 2 emissions into the atmosphere due to the production of drinking water in the islands.
Keyphrases
  • drinking water
  • health risk assessment
  • health risk
  • molecularly imprinted
  • randomized controlled trial
  • climate change
  • risk assessment
  • heavy metals
  • human health