Brain regulation of emotional conflict predicts antidepressant treatment response for depression.
Gregory A FonzoAmit EtkinYu ZhangWei WuCrystal CooperCherise Chin-FattManish K JhaJoseph M TrombelloThilo DeckersbachPhil AdamsMelvin McInnisPatrick J McGrathMyrna M WeissmanMaurizio FavaMadhukar H TrivediPublished in: Nature human behaviour (2019)
The efficacy of antidepressant treatment for depression is controversial due to the only modest superiority demonstrated over placebo. However, neurobiological heterogeneity within depression may limit overall antidepressant efficacy. We sought to identify a neurobiological phenotype responsive to antidepressant treatment by testing pretreatment brain activation during response to, and regulation of, emotional conflict as a moderator of the clinical benefit of the antidepressant sertraline versus placebo. Using neuroimaging data from a large randomized controlled trial, we found widespread moderation of clinical benefits by brain activity during regulation of emotional conflict, in which greater downregulation of conflict-responsive regions predicted better sertraline outcomes. Treatment-predictive machine learning using brain metrics outperformed a model trained on clinical and demographic variables. Our findings demonstrate that antidepressant response is predicted by brain activity underlying a key self-regulatory emotional capacity. Leveraging brain-based measures in psychiatry will forge a path toward better treatment personalization, refined mechanistic insights and improved outcomes.
Keyphrases
- major depressive disorder
- randomized controlled trial
- machine learning
- white matter
- depressive symptoms
- resting state
- cell proliferation
- clinical trial
- systematic review
- bipolar disorder
- sleep quality
- functional connectivity
- multiple sclerosis
- combination therapy
- cancer therapy
- physical activity
- electronic health record
- artificial intelligence
- transcription factor
- weight loss
- resistance training
- skeletal muscle