Login / Signup

Vasopressor-Sparing Strategies in Patients with Shock: A Scoping-Review and an Evidence-Based Strategy Proposition.

Pierre-Grégoire GuinotAudrey MartinVivien BerthoudPierre VoizeuxLoic BartamianErminio SantangeloBelaid BouhemadMaxime Nguyen
Published in: Journal of clinical medicine (2021)
Despite the abundant literature on vasopressor therapy, few studies have focused on vasopressor-sparing strategies in patients with shock. We performed a scoping-review of the published studies evaluating vasopressor-sparing strategies by analyzing the results from randomized controlled trials conducted in patients with shock, with a focus on vasopressor doses and/or duration reduction. We analyzed 143 studies, mainly performed in septic shock. Our analysis demonstrated that several pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies are associated with a decrease in the duration of vasopressor therapy. These strategies are as follows: implementing a weaning strategy, vasopressin use, systemic glucocorticoid administration, beta-blockers, and normothermia. On the contrary, early goal directed therapies, including fluid therapy, oral vasopressors, vitamin C, and renal replacement therapy, are not associated with an increase in vasopressor-free days. Based on these results, we proposed an evidence-based vasopressor management strategy.
Keyphrases
  • septic shock
  • randomized controlled trial
  • robot assisted
  • case control
  • clinical trial
  • mechanical ventilation
  • bone marrow
  • cell therapy
  • angiotensin ii
  • acute respiratory distress syndrome
  • drug induced
  • double blind