Multicenter, randomized comparison between magnetically navigated and manually guided radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (the MagMa-AVNRT-trial).
Tilko ReentsClemens JilekPeter SchusterGeorg NölkerKatharina Koch-BüttnerSonia Ammar-BuschVerena SemmlerFelix BourierMarc KottmaierMarie KornmayerStephanie BrooksStephanie FichtnerChristof KolbIsabel DeisenhoferGabriele HesslingPublished in: Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society (2017)
The use of RMN for catheter ablation of AVNRT compared to a manual approach results in a reduction of fluoroscopy time and dosage of about 50% for both patients and physicians. Acute and midterm success and safety are comparable. RMN is a good alternative to a manual approach for AVNRT ablation.
Keyphrases
- catheter ablation
- atrial fibrillation
- radiofrequency ablation
- left atrial
- left atrial appendage
- end stage renal disease
- phase iii
- double blind
- ejection fraction
- chronic kidney disease
- primary care
- phase ii
- newly diagnosed
- liver failure
- clinical trial
- prognostic factors
- open label
- peritoneal dialysis
- study protocol
- squamous cell carcinoma
- intensive care unit
- randomized controlled trial
- placebo controlled
- respiratory failure
- lymph node
- patient reported outcomes
- neoadjuvant chemotherapy
- extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
- drug induced
- mechanical ventilation