Login / Signup

Accuracy of energy and nutrient intake estimation versus observed intake using 4 technology-assisted dietary assessment methods: a randomized crossover feeding study.

Clare WhittonClare E CollinsBarbara A MullanMegan E RolloSatvinder S DhaliwalRichard NormanCarol J BousheyEdward J DelpFengqing ZhuTracy A McCaffreySharon I KirkpatrickChristina M PollardJanelle D HealyAmira HassanShivangi GargPaul AtyeoSyed Aqif MukhtarDeborah A Kerr
Published in: The American journal of clinical nutrition (2024)
Under controlled conditions, Intake24, ASA24, and mFR-TA estimated average energy and nutrient intakes with reasonable validity, but intake distributions were estimated accurately by Intake24 only (energy and protein). This study may inform considerations regarding instruments of choice in future population surveillance. This trial was registered at Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry as ACTRN12621000209897.
Keyphrases
  • clinical trial
  • weight gain
  • public health
  • randomized controlled trial
  • study protocol
  • body mass index
  • phase iii
  • current status
  • small molecule
  • clinical evaluation