The protection of unrepresented patients in emergency care research.
Linus BroströmMats JohanssonPublished in: Accountability in research (2017)
In emergency care research, it may be the case that neither informed consent nor surrogate consent is possible. In order to nonetheless allow for such research, codes and regulations of research ethics have increasingly incorporated provisions regarding this specific situation. The protection that those provisions offer need to be better understood. This article addresses in what ways they protect individuals, and especially the extent to which the suggested protection compensates for the loss of surrogate consent. The Declaration of Helsinki, the Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, and the EU Clinical Trials Regulation serve as the main illustrations.
Keyphrases
- healthcare
- public health
- clinical trial
- end stage renal disease
- palliative care
- emergency department
- ejection fraction
- endothelial cells
- chronic kidney disease
- quality improvement
- randomized controlled trial
- prognostic factors
- peritoneal dialysis
- pain management
- machine learning
- patient reported outcomes
- induced pluripotent stem cells
- emergency medical
- study protocol
- big data
- patient reported
- health insurance
- phase iii