Login / Signup

Evaluation of ChatGPT as a diagnostic tool for medical learners and clinicians.

Ali HadiEdward TranBranavan NagarajanArjun Amrit Kirpalani
Published in: PloS one (2024)
ChatGPT in its current form is not accurate as a diagnostic tool. ChatGPT does not necessarily give factual correctness, despite the vast amount of information it was trained on. Based on our qualitative analysis, ChatGPT struggles with the interpretation of laboratory values, imaging results, and may overlook key information relevant to the diagnosis. However, it still offers utility as an educational tool. ChatGPT was generally correct in ruling out a specific differential diagnosis and providing reasonable next diagnostic steps. Additionally, answers were easy to understand, showcasing a potential benefit in simplifying complex concepts for medical learners. Our results should guide future research into harnessing ChatGPT's potential educational benefits, such as simplifying medical concepts and offering guidance on differential diagnoses and next steps.
Keyphrases
  • healthcare
  • high resolution
  • health information
  • systematic review
  • palliative care
  • human health
  • big data
  • social media
  • mass spectrometry
  • climate change
  • photodynamic therapy
  • artificial intelligence