Login / Signup

Validity evidence for Quality Improvement Knowledge Application Tool Revised (QIKAT-R) scores: consequences of rater number and type using neurology cases.

Charles KassardjianYoon Soo ParkSherri BraksickJeremy Cutsforth-GregoryCarrie RobertsonNathan YoungAndrea N Leep Hunderfund
Published in: BMJ quality & safety (2019)
Validity evidence was sufficient to support the use of the QIKAT-R with multiple scenarios and raters to assess resident QI knowledge application for formative or low-stakes summative purposes. The results provide practical information for educators to guide implementation decisions.
Keyphrases
  • quality improvement
  • healthcare
  • patient safety
  • climate change
  • primary care
  • health information
  • psychometric properties