Login / Signup

Enhancer-promoter interactions become more instructive in the transition from cell-fate specification to tissue differentiation.

Tim PollexAdam RabinowitzMaria Cristina GambettaRaquel Marco-FerreresRebecca R VialesAleksander JankowskiChristoph SchaubEileen E M Furlong
Published in: Nature genetics (2024)
To regulate expression, enhancers must come in proximity to their target gene. However, the relationship between the timing of enhancer-promoter (E-P) proximity and activity remains unclear, with examples of uncoupled, anticorrelated and correlated interactions. To assess this, we selected 600 characterized enhancers or promoters with tissue-specific activity in Drosophila embryos and performed Capture-C in FACS-purified myogenic or neurogenic cells during specification and tissue differentiation. This enabled direct comparison between E-P proximity and activity transitioning from OFF-to-ON and ON-to-OFF states across developmental conditions. This showed remarkably similar E-P topologies between specified muscle and neuronal cells, which are uncoupled from activity. During tissue differentiation, many new distal interactions emerge where changes in E-P proximity reflect changes in activity. The mode of E-P regulation therefore appears to change as embryogenesis proceeds, from largely permissive topologies during cell-fate specification to more instructive regulation during terminal tissue differentiation, when E-P proximity is coupled to activation.
Keyphrases
  • cell fate
  • induced apoptosis
  • transcription factor
  • dna methylation
  • gene expression
  • skeletal muscle
  • binding protein
  • poor prognosis
  • cell cycle arrest
  • brain injury
  • blood brain barrier