Five-year outcomes in trials comparing transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement: a pooled meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data.
Fabio BariliNicholas FreemantleFrancesco MusumeciBarbara MartinAmedeo AnselmiMauro RinaldiSanjay KaulJorge Rodriguez-RodaMichele Di MauroThierry FolliguetJean-Philippe VerhoyeMiguel Sousa-UvaAlessandro Parolarinull nullPublished in: European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (2022)
Although it could appear that there is no difference between TAVI and SAVR in the 5-year cumulative results, TAVI shows a strong protective effect in the short term that runs out after 1 year. TAVI becomes a risk factor for all-cause mortality and the composite end point after 24 months and for rehospitalization after 6 months.
Keyphrases
- transcatheter aortic valve implantation
- aortic valve replacement
- aortic valve
- aortic stenosis
- systematic review
- transcatheter aortic valve replacement
- ejection fraction
- meta analyses
- electronic health record
- left ventricular
- big data
- heart failure
- machine learning
- case control
- insulin resistance
- randomized controlled trial