Cost-effectiveness analysis of serplulimab as first-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Zhiwei ZhengLing FangHongfu CaiHuide ZhuPublished in: Immunotherapy (2023)
Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of serplulimab as first-line treatment for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Materials & methods: A partitioned survival model was created to evaluate costs and health outcomes. The model's robustness was evaluated using one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Results: Serplulimab demonstrated an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $104,537.375/quality-adjusted life-year in the overall population group. Subgroup analysis showed that serplulimab had incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $261,750.496/quality-adjusted life-year and $68,107.997/quality-adjusted life-year in the populations with PD-L1 1 ≤ combined positive score <10 and PD-L1 combined positive score ≥10, respectively. Conclusion: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of serplulimab therapy were found to exceed the willingness-to-pay threshold of $37,304.34. Thus, serplulimab is not cost-effective compared with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.
Keyphrases
- end stage renal disease
- ejection fraction
- quality improvement
- chronic kidney disease
- prognostic factors
- squamous cell carcinoma
- randomized controlled trial
- stem cells
- clinical trial
- locally advanced
- radiation therapy
- health insurance
- rectal cancer
- patient reported outcomes
- free survival
- patient reported
- open label
- genetic diversity