Impact of preprocessing methods on the Raman spectra of brain tissue.

Delineating cancer tissue while leaving functional tissue intact is crucial in brain tumor resection. Despite several available aids, surgeons are limited by preoperative or subjective tools. Raman spectroscopy is a label-free optical technique with promising indications for tumor tissue identification. To allow direct comparisons between measurements preprocessing of the Raman signal is required. There are many recognized methods for preprocessing Raman spectra; however, there is no universal standard. In this paper, six different preprocessing methods were tested on Raman spectra (n > 900) from fresh brain tissue samples (n = 34). The sample cohort included both primary brain tumors, such as adult-type diffuse gliomas and meningiomas, as well as metastases of breast cancer. Each tissue sample was classified according to the CNS WHO 2021 guidelines. The six methods include both direct and iterative polynomial fitting, mathematical morphology, signal derivative, commercial software, and a neural network. Data exploration was performed using principal component analysis, t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding, and k-means clustering. For each of the six methods, the parameter combination that explained the most variance in the data, i.e., resulting in the highest Gap-statistic, was chosen and compared to the other five methods. Depending on the preprocessing method, the resulting clusters varied in number, size, and associated spectral features. The detected features were associated with hemoglobin, neuroglobin, carotenoid, water, and protoporphyrin, as well as proteins and lipids. However, the spectral features seen in the Raman spectra could not be unambiguously assigned to tissue labels, regardless of preprocessing method. We have illustrated that depending on the chosen preprocessing method, the spectral appearance of Raman features from brain tumor tissue can change. Therefore, we argue both for caution in comparing spectral features from different Raman studies, as well as the importance of transparency of methodology and implementation of the preprocessing. As discussed in this study, Raman spectroscopy for in vivo guidance in neurosurgery requires fast and adaptive preprocessing. On this basis, a pre-trained neural network appears to be a promising approach for the operating room.