[Preliminary exploration of the clinical warning value of ischemic modified albumin in the development of pre-eclampsia].

Objective: To explore the clinical warning value of ischemic modified albumin (IMA) and IMA to human serum albumin (HSA) ratio (IMAR) in the development of pre-eclampsia (PE) and its severity. Methods: A total of 156 pregnant women with PE admitted to the Haidian District Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Beijing from April 2022 to March 2023 were collected as the PE group, and 156 healthy pregnant women with the same age and gestational age were matched as the control group. PE pregnant women were further divided into severe PE group (78 cases) and non-severe PE group (78 cases). Severe PE pregnant women were divided into emergency group (42 cases) and non-emergency group (36 cases) according to the disease progression time.All pregnant women were stratified according to their HSA levels (<30 g/L, 30-32 g/L, ≥32 g/L), and the peripheral blood IMA, HSA, and IMAR of pregnant women in different periods and subgroups were compared, and also the difference of IMA levels in umbilical artery blood. Bivariate correlation analysis was used to explore the correlation between severe PE and IMA or IMAR, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was used to analyze the diagnostic value of IMA, HSA, and IMAR for PE and severe PE. Results: (1) The IMA level and IMAR in peripheral serum of pregnant women in the PE group at diagnosis, and the IMA level in umbilical artery blood at delivery, and peripheral serum at 2 days after delivery were higher than those in the control group. The HSA level in peripheral serum was lower than that in the control group at diagnosis, and the differences were statistically significant (all P <0.001). (2) The IMA level and IMAR in the peripheral serum of pregnant women with severe PE were higher than those in the non-severe PE group at diagnosis, while the HSA level were lower than those in the non-severe PE group. The differences were statistically significant (all P <0.05). At diagnosis, the IMA level and IMAR in peripheral serum of pregnant women in the emergency group were higher than those in the non-emergency group, while the HSA level was lower than that in the non-emergency group. The differences were statistically significant (all P <0.05). When diagnosed, the peripheral serum IMA levels of pregnant women in the PE group were compared between subgroups with HSA<30 g/L, 30-32 g/L, ≥32 g/L, and there was no statistically significant difference ( F =0.366, P =0.694). However, the IMAR was compared between the three subgroups, and the difference was statistically significant ( F =28.544, P <0.001), which increased with the decrease of HSA levels. In the subgroup with HSA≥32 g/L, the peripheral serum IMA level and IMAR of pregnant women in the PE group were higher than those in the control group at diagnosis, and the differences were statistically significant (all P <0.001). (3) The severe PE manifestations positively correlated with peripheral serum IMAR at diagnosis include systolic blood pressure ( r =0.279), mean arterial pressure ( r =0.212), and urinary protein quantification ( r =0.277), while the severe PE manifestations negatively correlated include HSA levels ( r =-0.644) and newborn birth weight ( r =-0.305), all of which were significantly correlated ( P <0.05). (4) The area under curve (AUC) for IMAR diagnosis of PE was 0.875 (95% CI : 0.833-0.916), with the highest diagnostic efficiency at a cutoff value of 2.06, sensitivity of 72.5%, and specificity of 85.1%. The AUC for diagnosing severe PE was 0.871 (95% CI : 0.822-0.919), with the highest diagnostic efficacy at a cutoff value of 2.18, sensitivity of 72.3%, and specificity of 88.3%. The diagnostic efficacy of IMAR for PE and severe PE were higher than those of IMA and HSA levels. Conclusions: The level of IMA and IMAR in pregnant women with PE are higher than those in normal pregnant women. IMA and IMAR are correlated with the severity of PE, with IMAR changes occurring earlier and more significantly. IMAR could be considered as one of the evaluation indicators for the development of PE, or as a more sensitive PE severity warning indicator than HSA.