'Intermittent' versus 'continuous' ScvO2 monitoring in children with septic shock: a randomised, non-inferiority trial.
Jhuma SankarMan SinghKiran KumarM Jeeva SankarSushil Kumar KabraRakesh LodhaPublished in: Intensive care medicine (2019)
Given that a greater proportion of children attained therapeutic end points in the first 6 h, continuous monitoring of ScvO2 should preferably be used to titrate therapy in the first few hours in children with septic shock. In the absence of such facility, intermittent monitoring of ScvO2 can be used to titrate therapy in these children, given the lack of difference in the proportion of patients achieving shock resolution at 24 h or in risk of mortality between the intermittent and continuous groups.
Keyphrases
- septic shock
- young adults
- end stage renal disease
- high intensity
- study protocol
- chronic kidney disease
- randomized controlled trial
- newly diagnosed
- cardiovascular disease
- type diabetes
- risk factors
- open label
- prognostic factors
- mesenchymal stem cells
- cardiovascular events
- peritoneal dialysis
- single molecule
- patient reported