Rescheduling Part 2 of the 11+ reduces injury burden and increases compliance in semi-professional football.

Although the 11+ program has been shown to reduce injuries in sub-elite football, program compliance is typically poor, suggesting that strategies to optimize delivery are necessary. This study investigated the effect of rescheduling Part 2 of the three-part 11+ program on program effectiveness. Twenty-five semi-professional football clubs were randomly allocated to either a Standard-11+ (n = 398 players) or P2post group (n = 408 players). Both groups performed the 11+ program at least twice a week throughout the 2017 football season. The Standard-11+ group performed the entire 11+ program before training activities commenced, whereas the P2post group performed Parts 1 and 3 of the 11+ program before and Part 2 after training. Injuries, exposure, and individual player 11+ dose were monitored throughout the season. No significant between group difference in injury incidence rate (P2pos t vs Standard-11+ = 11.8 vs 12.3 injuries/1000 h) was observed. Severe time loss injuries > 28 days (33 vs 58 injuries; P < .002) and total days lost to injury (4303 vs 5815 days; P < .001) were lower in the P2post group. A higher 11+ program dose was observed in the P2post (29.1 doses; 95% CI 27.9-30.1) versus Standard-11+ group (18.9 doses; 95% CI 17.6-20.2; P < .001). In semi-professional football, rescheduling Part 2 of the 11+ program to the end of training maintained the effectiveness of the original 11+ program to reduce injury incidence. Importantly, rescheduling Part 2 improved player compliance and reduced the number of severe injuries and total injury burden, thereby enhancing effectiveness of the 11+ program.