Trans-catheter aortic valve replacement program in a community hospital - Comparison with US national data.
Dan LobermanShahzad ShaefiRephael MohrPhillip DombrowskiRichard B ZelmanYifan ZhengPaul A PirundiniTomer Ziv-BaranPublished in: PloS one (2018)
Symptomatic aortic stenosis remains a surgical disease, with aortic valve replacement resulting in symptom reduction and improvement in survival. For patients who are deemed a higher surgical risk, Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) is a viable, less invasive and increasingly common alternative. The study compares early outcomes in patients treated within one year of the commencement of TAVR program in a community hospital against outcomes of TAVR patients from nationwide reported data (Society of Thoracic Surgeons/ American College of Cardiology TVT registry). Preoperative characteristics and standardized procedural outcomes of all patients who underwent TAVR in Cape Cod Hospital between June 2015 and May 2016 (n = 62, CCH group) were compared using standardized data format to those of TAVR patients operated during the same time period in other centers within the United States participating in the STS/ACC TVT Registry (n = 24,497, USA group). Most preoperative patient characteristics were similar between groups. However, CCH patients were older (age≥80 years: 77.4% versus 64.3%, p = 0.032) and more likely to be non-elective cases (37.1% versus 9.7%, p<0.001). All 62 TAVR procedures in CCH were performed in the catheterization laboratory unlike most (89.7%) of the procedures in the USA group that were performed in hybrid rooms. A larger proportion of patients in the USA registry underwent TAVR under general anesthesia (78.2% vs.37.1%, P<0.001). Early aortic valve re- intervention rate was 0/62 (0%) in the CCH group VS. 74/ 24,497 (0.3%) in the USA group. In hospital mortality, which was defined as death of any cause during thirty days from date of operation, (CCH: 0% vs. USA: 2.5%, p = 0.410) and occurrence of early adverse events (including postoperative para-valvular leaks, conduction defects requiring pacemakers, neurologic and renal complications) were similar in the two groups. The study concludes that with specific team training and co-ordination, and with active support of experienced personnel, high risk patients with severe aortic valve stenosis can be managed safely with a TAVR procedure in a community hospital.
Keyphrases
- aortic valve
- aortic stenosis
- transcatheter aortic valve replacement
- ejection fraction
- aortic valve replacement
- transcatheter aortic valve implantation
- end stage renal disease
- newly diagnosed
- chronic kidney disease
- healthcare
- mental health
- randomized controlled trial
- left ventricular
- risk assessment
- prognostic factors
- quality improvement
- patients undergoing
- metabolic syndrome
- heart failure
- atrial fibrillation
- risk factors
- acute kidney injury
- peritoneal dialysis
- emergency department
- south africa
- spinal cord
- patient reported outcomes
- adverse drug