Clinical Differences between SARS-CoV-2 and RSV Infections in Infants: Findings from a Case-Control Study.

Infants are a unique pediatric group due to their high hospitalization rates and unfavorable outcomes from acute infectious diseases. Understanding the clinical differences and aftereffects of SARS-CoV-2 in comparison to other prevalent viruses in this age group, like RSV, is crucial for effective management. We conducted a retrospective case-control study of infants hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 or respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection in one year, in a tertiary pediatric hospital in Bucharest, Romania. A total of 188 infants were included in the analysis in a 1:1 ratio (94 with SARS-CoV-2 infection and 94 with RSV infection). Infants with COVID-19 were 10.2 times more likely to have fever ( p < 0.001) and 2.4 times more likely to have diarrhea ( p = 0.016). Conversely, infants with RSV were 2.5 times more likely to have a cough ( p < 0.001), 3.0 times more likely to have nasal congestion ( p < 0.001), and 14.7 times more likely to present with dyspnea ( p < 0.001). Increased lymphocyte count was more common in infants with RSV ( p = 0.008), while lymphopenia was more frequent in infants with SARS-CoV-2 ( p = 0.011). The median length of hospital stay was one day longer in infants with RSV infection (5 days vs. 4 days). Overall, infants with RSV infection had a 27.3-fold increased risk of developing respiratory failure ( p < 0.001), while infants with COVID-19 had a 5.8-fold increased risk of laryngitis ( p = 0.003). Our findings suggest that infants with SARS-CoV-2 infection may present with polymorphic symptoms, mostly dominated by fever, whereas infants with RSV often present with respiratory symptoms. Laboratory differentiation between the two infections is challenging; therefore, the use of rapid antigen or molecular diagnostic tests is crucial for accurate diagnosis, epidemiologically appropriate measures, and effective management. Continued surveillance of both viruses in infants, and beyond, and the implementation of specific control measures are needed to mitigate their impact on this vulnerable pediatric group.