Bromelain-based enzymatic debridement of chronic wounds: Results of a multicentre randomized controlled trial.
Yaron ShohamEyal ShapiraJosef HaikMoti HaratsDana EgoziDror RobinsonLeonid KoganRania ElkhatibGeza TelekAvshalom ShalomPublished in: Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society (2021)
Chronic wounds are estimated to affect over 6 million people annually in the United States with an estimated annual cost of $25 billion. Debridement represents a key step in their management and is considered a basic necessity to induce the functional process of tissue repair. However, there is an unmet need for an efficient rapid acting non-surgical debridement agent. Bromelain-based enzymatic debridement has been proven to provide an effective, selective and safe non-surgical debridement in deep burns. EscharEx (MediWound Ltd, Yavne, Israel), is a bromelain-based enzymatic debridement agent currently in development for chronic wounds. The aim of this study was to assess its safety and efficacy in chronic wounds. Seventy-three patients suffering from a lower extremity ulcer of diabetic/venous insufficiency/post-surgical/traumatic aetiology were enrolled in a multicentre, assessor blinded, randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized to topical treatment by either EscharEx or its gel vehicle for up to 10 daily 4 hour applications, and then continued follow-up for up to 6 months. The EscharEx arm achieved a significantly higher incidence of complete debridement compared to the gel vehicle arm; 55 versus 29% (p = .047), thus meeting the primary endpoint of this study. The EscharEx and gel vehicle arms achieved similar reductions in wound area, non-viable tissue area and wound healing scores during the debridement period. There were no significant differences between the arms in the incidence of complete wound closure (41% in the EsxcharEx arm vs. 53% in the gel vehicle arm) and in the mean time to complete wound closure (70.0 ± 32.8 days in the EsxcharEx arm vs. 65.7 ± 38.4 days in gel vehicle arm). There were no significant safety issues and EscharEx demonstrated a favourable benefit to risk profile.
Keyphrases
- wound healing
- randomized controlled trial
- end stage renal disease
- study protocol
- double blind
- newly diagnosed
- chronic kidney disease
- clinical trial
- ejection fraction
- hydrogen peroxide
- patient reported outcomes
- peritoneal dialysis
- type diabetes
- prognostic factors
- spinal cord injury
- risk factors
- placebo controlled
- open label
- nitric oxide
- patient reported
- phase iii
- quantum dots
- phase ii