Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in PD-L1-positive metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.
Min HuangPeter FaschingAmin HaideraliWilbur PanEmma GrayZheng-Yi ZhouPeter HuMitashri ChaudhuriCeline Le Bailly De TilleghemNicolas CappoenJoyce O'ShaughnessyPublished in: Immunotherapy (2022)
Objective: This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab/chemotherapy combinations for previously untreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer patients in the USA with PD-L1 combined positive score ≥10. Methods: A partitioned-survival model was developed to project health outcomes and direct medical costs over a 20-year time horizon. Efficacy and safety data were from randomized clinical trials. Comparative effectiveness of indirect comparators was assessed using network meta-analyses. A series of sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the results. Results: Pembrolizumab/chemotherapy resulted in total quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gains of 0.70 years and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of US$182,732/QALY compared with chemotherapy alone. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for pembrolizumab/nab-paclitaxel versus atezolizumab/nab-paclitaxel was US$44,157/QALY. Sensitivity analyses showed the results were robust over plausible values of model inputs. Conclusion: Pembrolizumab/chemotherapy is cost effective compared with chemotherapy as well as atezolizumab/nab-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for PD-L1-positive metastatic triple-negative breast cancer from a US payer perspective.
Keyphrases
- advanced non small cell lung cancer
- locally advanced
- squamous cell carcinoma
- chemotherapy induced
- small cell lung cancer
- systematic review
- healthcare
- end stage renal disease
- meta analyses
- randomized controlled trial
- chronic kidney disease
- newly diagnosed
- ejection fraction
- rectal cancer
- machine learning
- radiation therapy
- patient reported outcomes
- tyrosine kinase
- patient reported