Login / Signup

Listen to Us: Perceptions of Animal Voice and Agency.

Anja M ThomsenWilliam T BorrieKelly K MillerAdam P A Cardilini
Published in: Animals : an open access journal from MDPI (2023)
In many contexts, the interests of nonhuman animals (hereafter "animals") are often overlooked or considered to be a lower priority than those of humans. While strong arguments exist for taking animal moral claims seriously, these largely go unheard due to dominant anthropocentric attitudes and beliefs. This study aimed to explore how animal interests might be best represented in the human world. We conducted interviews to investigate people's perceptions of what it means to speak for other animals and who can reliably represent animal interests. Using Grounded Theory analytical methods, we identified one major theme: "Animal voice", and its subthemes: "Animals do/do not have a voice", "Human language constructs realities and paradigms", and "Let animals speak". Our findings illustrate how human language constructs contribute to shaping the realities of animals by contextually defining them as voiceless. This has serious implications for animals, society, and the environment. Drawing parallels with the relevant literature, our results reflect calls for the social and political recognition of animal voice as fundamental to animal representation. We recommend future research to focus on developing ethical and compassionate approaches to understanding animal subjective experiences to empower and amplify animal voices.
Keyphrases
  • endothelial cells
  • healthcare
  • primary care
  • systematic review
  • autism spectrum disorder
  • induced pluripotent stem cells
  • pluripotent stem cells
  • mass spectrometry
  • current status
  • liquid chromatography