Case Fatality Rates for Patients with COVID-19 Requiring Invasive Mechanical Ventilation. A Meta-analysis.
Zheng Jie LimAshwin SubramaniamMallikarjuna Ponnapa ReddyGabriel Elan BlecherUmesh KadamAfsana AfrozBaki BillahSushma AshwinMark KubickiFederico BilottaJ Randall CurtisFrancesca RubulottaPublished in: American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine (2021)
Rationale: Initial reports of case fatality rates (CFRs) among adults with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) are highly variable.Objectives: To examine the CFR of patients with COVID-19 receiving IMV.Methods: Two authors independently searched PubMed, Embase, medRxiv, bioRxiv, the COVID-19 living systematic review, and national registry databases. The primary outcome was the "reported CFR" for patients with confirmed COVID-19 requiring IMV. "Definitive hospital CFR" for patients with outcomes at hospital discharge was also investigated. Finally, CFR was analyzed by patient age, geographic region, and study quality on the basis of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.Measurements and Results: Sixty-nine studies were included, describing 57,420 adult patients with COVID-19 who received IMV. Overall reported CFR was estimated as 45% (95% confidence interval [CI], 39-52%). Fifty-four of 69 studies stated whether hospital outcomes were available but provided a definitive hospital outcome on only 13,120 (22.8%) of the total IMV patient population. Among studies in which age-stratified CFR was available, pooled CFR estimates ranged from 47.9% (95% CI, 46.4-49.4%) in younger patients (age ≤40 yr) to 84.4% (95% CI, 83.3-85.4%) in older patients (age >80 yr). CFR was also higher in early COVID-19 epicenters. Overall heterogeneity is high (I2 >90%), with nonsignificant Egger's regression test suggesting no publication bias.Conclusions: Almost half of patients with COVID-19 receiving IMV died based on the reported CFR, but variable CFR reporting methods resulted in a wide range of CFRs between studies. The reported CFR was higher in older patients and in early pandemic epicenters, which may be influenced by limited ICU resources. Reporting of definitive outcomes on all patients would facilitate comparisons between studies.Systematic review registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020186997).
Keyphrases
- coronavirus disease
- mechanical ventilation
- systematic review
- sars cov
- end stage renal disease
- intensive care unit
- adverse drug
- acute respiratory distress syndrome
- newly diagnosed
- respiratory syndrome coronavirus
- healthcare
- ejection fraction
- case control
- chronic kidney disease
- respiratory failure
- case report
- randomized controlled trial
- peritoneal dialysis
- clinical trial
- high resolution
- metabolic syndrome
- acute care
- machine learning
- single cell
- young adults
- patient reported outcomes
- electronic health record
- extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
- deep learning
- mass spectrometry
- big data
- study protocol
- high speed