Labor curves based on cervical dilatation over time and their accuracy and effectiveness: A systematic scoping review.
Johanne Mamohau Egenberg HuurninkEllen BlixElisabeth HalsAnne KaasenStine BernitzTina LavenderMia AhlbergPål ØianAase Irene HøifødtAndrea Solnes MiltenburgAase Serine Devold PayPublished in: PloS one (2024)
Of 26,073 potentially eligible studies, 108 studies were included. Seventy-three studies described labor curves, of which ten of the thirteen largest were based mainly on the United States Consortium on Safe Labor cohort. Labor curve endpoints were 10 cm cervical dilatation in 69 studies and vaginal birth in 4 studies. Labor curve accuracy was assessed in 26 studies, of which all 15 published after 1986 were from low- and middle-income countries. Recent studies of labor curve accuracy in high-income countries are lacking. The effectiveness of labor curves was assessed in 13 studies, which failed to prove the superiority of any curve. Patient-reported health and well-being is an underrepresented outcome in evaluations of labor curves. The usefulness of labor curves is still a matter of debate, as studies have failed to prove their accuracy or effectiveness.