Login / Signup

Peer review of searches for studies for health technology assessments, systematic reviews, and other evidence syntheses.

Carol LefebvreSteven Duffy
Published in: International journal of technology assessment in health care (2021)
Searches for evidence syntheses should be peer reviewed by a suitably qualified and experienced librarian or information specialist after being designed, ideally, by another suitably qualified and experienced librarian or information specialist. Peer review of searches should take place at two important stages in the evidence synthesis process; at the outset of the project prior to the searches being run and at the prepublication stage. There is little empirical evidence, however, to support the effectiveness of peer review of searches. Further research is required to assess this. Those wishing to stay up to date with the latest developments in information retrieval, including peer review of searches, should consult the SuRe Info resource (http://www.sure-info.org), which seeks to help information specialists and others by providing easy access to the findings from current information retrieval methods research and thus support more research-based information retrieval practice.
Keyphrases
  • health information
  • systematic review
  • healthcare
  • palliative care
  • randomized controlled trial
  • primary care
  • mental health