The impact of COVID-19 on domestic violence agency functioning: A case study.
Natania S LippNicole L JohnsonPublished in: The Journal of social issues (2022)
Initial evidence suggests that rates of intimate partner violence (IPV) increased at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, much of the prevalence research has focused on survivors' experiences of IPV during the initial lockdown period from March to June 2020. The current study adds to this initial research by centering the experience of a domestic violence agency located in the United States, 3-months prior to, during, and after the COVID-19 lockdown. The results suggest a similar pattern across service utilization (e.g., total clients served, calls, safe house capacity) and survivor demographics (e.g., race/ethnicity, cisgender women and men), with an initial decrease in service utilization from pre-lockdown to lockdown and an increase, surpassing pre-lockdown, post-lockdown. The only deviations from this pattern of service utilization were for sexual minority individuals, whose service utilization continued to decline post-lockdown and Asian American/Pacific Islander and trans/gender-nonbinary survivors who rarely utilized services across the time period. Additionally, the domestic violence agency relied heavily on their existing finances, well-rounded staff training, and staff wellbeing throughout the pandemic. The unique challenges that COVID-19 provided demanded flexibility, increased technological utilization, and additional funding particularly for safe housing. Implications for future research, intervention, and policy change are provided below.
Keyphrases
- mental health
- intimate partner violence
- coronavirus disease
- sars cov
- healthcare
- mental illness
- randomized controlled trial
- young adults
- respiratory syndrome coronavirus
- metabolic syndrome
- public health
- polycystic ovary syndrome
- hepatitis c virus
- middle aged
- insulin resistance
- long term care
- health insurance
- pregnancy outcomes
- current status