Login / Signup

Reactogenicity to the mRNA-1273 Booster According to Previous mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination.

Oleguer Parés-BadellRicardo Zules-OñaLluís ArmadansLaia PinósBlanca Borrás-BermejoSusana OteroJosé Ángel Rodrigo-PendásMartí Vivet-EscaléYolima Cossio-GilAntònia AgustíCristina AguileraMagda CampinsXavier Martínez-Gómez
Published in: Vaccines (2022)
The objective of this study was to assess the local and systemic adverse reactions after the administration of a COVID-19 mRNA-1273 booster between December 2021 and February 2022 by comparing the type of mRNA vaccine used as primary series (mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2) and homologous versus heterologous booster in health care workers (HCW). A cross-sectional study was performed in HCW at a tertiary hospital in Barcelona, Spain. A total of 17% of booster recipients responded to the questionnaire. The frequency of reactogenicity after the mRNA-1273 booster (88.5%) was similar to the mRNA-1273 primary doses (85.8%), and higher than the BNT162b2 primary doses (71.1%). The reactogenicity was similar after receiving a heterologous booster compared to a homologous booster (88.0% vs. 90.2%, p = 0.3), and no statistically significant differences were identified in any local or systemic reactions. A higher frequency of medical leave was identified in the homologous booster dose group vs. the heterologous booster dose group (AOR 1.45; 95% CI: 1.00-2.07; p = 0.045). Our findings could be helpful in improving vaccine confidence toward heterologous combinations in the general population and in health care workers.
Keyphrases
  • binding protein
  • sars cov
  • dna damage
  • dna repair
  • emergency department
  • physical activity
  • saccharomyces cerevisiae
  • cross sectional
  • risk factors
  • respiratory syndrome coronavirus