Comparison of Aortobifemoral Bypass and Endovascular Treatment for Chronic Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Occlusion From the CHAOS ( CH ronic A bdominal Aortic O cclusion, A S ian Multicenter) Registry.
Naoki FujimuraMitsuyoshi TakaharaHideaki ObaraShigeo IchihashiRobbie K GeorgeKimihiro IgariHiroshi BannoKoji HozawaTerutoshi YamaokaCh'ng J KianJimmy Wei-Hwa TanKi Hyuk ParkPang Y C SkyiTaku KatoOsami KawaradaPublished in: Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (2022)
Even with recent advancements in EVT, primary patency was still significantly better for ABF in CTO of the IAA. However, there was no difference between the groups in terms of secondary patency and freedom from TLR at 5 years. Furthermore, there was no difference in procedural success, complications, mortality, and improvement in the Rutherford classification during the periprocedural period, with significantly shorter procedure time and hospital stay in the EVT group.
Keyphrases
- endovascular treatment
- abdominal aortic
- risk factors
- machine learning
- toll like receptor
- deep learning
- inflammatory response
- cardiovascular events
- immune response
- healthcare
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- left ventricular
- minimally invasive
- room temperature
- cross sectional
- direct oral anticoagulants
- abdominal aortic aneurysm
- emergency department
- aortic dissection
- acute coronary syndrome
- type diabetes
- double blind
- heart failure
- drug induced
- coronary artery
- pulmonary hypertension