Login / Signup

Systemic Obstacles to Addressing Research Misconduct in Higher Education: A Case Study.

James GoldenCatherine M MazzottaKimberly Zittel-Barr
Published in: Journal of academic ethics (2021)
Several widely publicized incidents of academic research misconduct, combined with the politicization of the role of science in public health and policy discourse (e.g., COVID, immunizations) threaten to undermine faith in the integrity of empirical research. Researchers often maintain that peer-review and study replication allow the field to self-police and self-correct; however, stark disparities between official reports of academic research misconduct and self-reports of academic researchers, specifically with regard to data fabrication, belie this argument. Further, systemic imperatives in academic settings often incentivize institutional responses that focus on minimizing reputational harm rather than the impact of fabricated data on the integrity of extant and future research.
Keyphrases
  • public health
  • healthcare
  • electronic health record
  • medical students
  • sars cov
  • coronavirus disease
  • big data
  • adverse drug
  • patient safety
  • mental health
  • emergency department
  • global health
  • current status
  • low cost