Management and prognosis of acute traumatic cervical central cord syndrome: systematic review and Spinal Cord Society-Spine Trauma Study Group position statement.
P K Karthik YelamarthyHarvinder Singh ChhabraAlex VaccaroGayatri VishwakarmaPatrick KlugerAnkur NandaRainer AbelWee Fu TanBrian GardnerP Sarat ChandraSandip ChatterjeeSerdar KahramanSait NaderiSaumyajit BasuFrancois TheronPublished in: European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society (2019)
There is reasonable evidence that patients with ATCCS secondary to vertebral fracture, dislocation, traumatic disc herniation or instability have better outcomes with early surgery (< 24 h). In patients of ATCCS secondary to extension injury in stenotic cervical canal without fracture/fracture dislocation/traumatic disc herniation/instability, there is requirement of high-quality prospective randomized controlled trials to resolve controversy regarding early surgery versus conservative management and delayed surgery if recovery plateaus or if there is a neurological deterioration. Until such time decision on surgery and its timing should be left to the judgment of physician, deliberating on pros and cons relevant to the particular patient and involving the well-informed patient and relatives in decision making. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Keyphrases
- minimally invasive
- coronary artery bypass
- spinal cord injury
- systematic review
- spinal cord
- decision making
- case report
- randomized controlled trial
- surgical site infection
- end stage renal disease
- emergency department
- meta analyses
- primary care
- ejection fraction
- chronic kidney disease
- liver failure
- type diabetes
- newly diagnosed
- drug induced
- adipose tissue
- neuropathic pain
- skeletal muscle
- hepatitis b virus
- extracorporeal membrane oxygenation