Multi-stage Screening in Early Intervention: A Critical Strategy for Improving ASD Identification and Addressing Disparities.
Abbey EisenhowerFrances Martinez PedrazaR Christopher SheldrickElizabeth FrenetteNoah HochSophie BruntAlice S CarterPublished in: Journal of autism and developmental disorders (2021)
Health disparities in ASD detection affect children's access to subsequent interventions. We examined potential disparities in implementation of a multi-stage ASD screening and diagnostic evaluation protocol in Part C Early Intervention with 4943 children ages 14-36 months (mean 22.0 months; 62.9% boys, 73.3% children of color, 34.9% non-English-primary language, 64.5% publicly-insured). Participation and follow-through were high (64.9% and 65.3% at first- and second-stage screening, respectively, 84.6% at diagnostic evaluation). Logistic regressions identified predictors of screening participation and outcomes at each stage; demographic differences (race, language, public insurance) were observed only at first-stage screening and reflected higher participation for children of color and higher positive screens for publicly-insured children. Results suggest the multi-stage screening protocol shows promise in addressing disparities in early diagnosis.
Keyphrases
- autism spectrum disorder
- young adults
- randomized controlled trial
- healthcare
- physical activity
- primary care
- attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
- mental health
- intellectual disability
- emergency department
- risk assessment
- high throughput
- affordable care act
- gene expression
- skeletal muscle
- genome wide
- machine learning
- metabolic syndrome
- health insurance
- single cell
- deep learning
- social media
- weight loss
- big data
- quantum dots
- drug induced