The role of context in implementation research for non-communicable diseases: Answering the 'how-to' dilemma.
Meena DaivadanamMaia IngramKristi Sidney AnnerstedtGary ParkerKirsty BobrowLisa DolovichGillian GouldMichaela RiddellRajesh VedanthanJacqui WebsterPilvikki AbsetzHelle Mölsted AlvessonOdysseas AndroutsosNiels ChavannesBriana CortezDevarsetty PraveenEdward FottrellFrancisco Gonzalez-SalazarJane GoudgeOmarys HerasmeHannah JenningsDeksha KapoorJemima KamanoMarise J KasteleynChristina KyriakosYannis ManiosKishor MogulluruMayowa OwolabiMaria Lazo-PorrasWnurinham SilvaAmanda ThriftEzinne UvereRuth WebsterRianne van der KleijJosefien van OlmenConstantine VardavasPuhong Zhangnull nullPublished in: PloS one (2019)
Context is regarded as critical and influenced the design and implementation of the GACD funded chronic disease interventions. There are different approaches to assess and incorporate context as demonstrated by this study and further research is required to systematically evaluate contextual approaches in terms of how they contribute to effectiveness or implementation outcomes.