Login / Signup

Investigating the transparency of reporting in two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization studies using the MR-Base platform.

Benjamin WoolfNina Di CaraChristopher Moreno-StokoeVeronika SkrivankovaKatie DraxJulian P T HigginsGibran HemaniMarcus R MunafòGeorge Davey SmithJames YarmolinskyRebecca C Richmond
Published in: International journal of epidemiology (2022)
The quality of reporting of two-sample Mendelian randomization studies in our sample was generally poor. Journals and researchers should consider using the STROBE-MR guidelines to improve reporting quality.
Keyphrases
  • adverse drug
  • magnetic resonance
  • contrast enhanced
  • electronic health record
  • high throughput
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • randomized controlled trial
  • emergency department