Risk-benefit trade-offs and precision utilities in phase I-II clinical trials.
Pavlos MsaouelJuhee LeePeter F ThallPublished in: Clinical trials (London, England) (2023)
Herein, we first describe why it is essential to consider clinical practice when designing a clinical trial and outline a stepwise process for doing this. We then review a precision phase I-II design based on utilities tailored to prognostic subgroups that characterize efficacy-toxicity risk-benefit trade-offs. The design chooses each patient's dose to optimize their expected utility and allows patients in different prognostic subgroups to have different optimal doses. We illustrate the design with a dose-finding trial of a new therapeutic agent for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Keyphrases
- clinical trial
- phase ii
- end stage renal disease
- clinical practice
- phase iii
- study protocol
- ejection fraction
- small cell lung cancer
- chronic kidney disease
- squamous cell carcinoma
- newly diagnosed
- open label
- oxidative stress
- prognostic factors
- peritoneal dialysis
- case report
- patient reported outcomes
- randomized controlled trial