Comparison of Gluten Extraction Protocols Assessed by LC-MS/MS Analysis.
Azadeh FallahbagheryWei ZouKeren ByrneCrispin A HowittMichelle Lisa ColgravePublished in: Journal of agricultural and food chemistry (2017)
The efficiency of gluten extraction is of critical importance to the results derived from any analytical method for gluten detection and quantitation, whether it employs reagent-based technology (antibodies) or analytical instrumentation (mass spectrometry). If the target proteins are not efficiently extracted, the end result will be an under-estimation in the gluten content posing a health risk to people affected by conditions such as celiac disease (CD) and nonceliac gluten sensitivity (NCGS). Five different extraction protocols were investigated using LC-MRM-MS for their ability to efficiently and reproducibly extract gluten. The rapid and simple "IPA/DTT" protocol and related "two-step" protocol were enriched for gluten proteins, 55/86% (trypsin/chymotrypsin) and 41/68% of all protein identifications, respectively, with both methods showing high reproducibility (CV < 15%). When using multistep protocols, it was critical to examine all fractions, as coextraction of proteins occurred across fractions, with significant levels of proteins existing in unexpected fractions and not all proteins within a particular gluten class behaving the same.
Keyphrases
- celiac disease
- mass spectrometry
- liquid chromatography
- health risk
- randomized controlled trial
- irritable bowel syndrome
- multiple sclerosis
- drinking water
- heavy metals
- high resolution
- high performance liquid chromatography
- high resolution mass spectrometry
- capillary electrophoresis
- gas chromatography
- sensitive detection
- real time pcr
- label free