Reclassification of Treatment Strategy with Fractional Flow Reserve in Cancer Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.
Jin Wan KimTariq J DayahAwad I JavaidDominique J MonlezunDinu V BalanescuTeodora DonisanKaveh KarimzadAbdul HakeemDavid L BooneNicolas PalaskasJuan Lopez-MatteiPeter Y KimJean-Bernard DurandJuhee SongSerban M BalanescuEric H YangJoerg HerrmannKonstantinos MarmagkiolisKonstantinos ToutouzasNils P JohnsonCezar A IliescuPublished in: Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) (2022)
Background and Objectives : Cancer and coronary artery disease (CAD) often coexist. Compared to quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), fractional flow reserve (FFR) has emerged as a more reliable method of identifying significant coronary stenoses. We aimed to assess the specific management, safety and outcomes of FFR-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in cancer patients with stable CAD. Materials and Methods : FFR was used to assess cancer patients that underwent coronary angiography for stable CAD between September 2008 and May 2016, and were found to have ≥50% stenosis by QCA. Patients with lesions with an FFR > 0.75 received medical therapy alone, while those with FFR ≤ 0.75 were revascularized. Procedure-related complications, all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularizations were analyzed. Results : Fifty-seven patients with stable CAD underwent FFR on 57 lesions. Out of 31 patients with ≥70% stenosis as measured by QCA, 14 (45.1%) had an FFR ≥ 0.75 and lesions were reclassified as moderate and did not receive PCI nor DAPT. Out of 26 patients with <70% stenosis as measured by QCA, 6 (23%) had an FFR < 0.75 and were reclassified as severe and were treated with PCI and associated DAPT. No periprocedural complications, urgent revascularization, acute coronary syndromes, or cardiovascular deaths were noted. There was a 22.8% mortality at 1 year, all cancer related. Patients who received a stent by FFR assessment showed a significant association with decreased risk of all-cause death (HR: 0.37, 95% CI 0.15-0.90, p = 0.03). Conclusions : Further studies are needed to define the optimal therapeutic approach for cancer patients with CAD. Using an FFR cut-off point of 0.75 to guide PCI translates into fewer interventions and can facilitate cancer care. There was an overall reduction in mortality in patients that received a stent, suggesting increased resilience to cancer therapy and progression.
Keyphrases
- coronary artery disease
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- antiplatelet therapy
- cardiovascular events
- st segment elevation myocardial infarction
- coronary artery bypass grafting
- st elevation myocardial infarction
- acute myocardial infarction
- papillary thyroid
- acute coronary syndrome
- squamous cell
- squamous cell carcinoma
- atrial fibrillation
- lymph node metastasis
- left ventricular
- ejection fraction
- newly diagnosed
- adipose tissue
- coronary artery
- skeletal muscle
- heart failure
- coronary artery bypass
- young adults
- end stage renal disease
- childhood cancer
- aortic stenosis
- drug induced
- cardiovascular disease
- physical activity
- social support
- insulin resistance
- metabolic syndrome
- type diabetes
- high resolution
- minimally invasive
- mesenchymal stem cells