A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Liver Resection with the Rf-Based Device Habib™-4X with the Clamp-Crush Technique.
Jayant KumarMikael H SodergrenIsabella RecciaTomokazu KusanoDimitris ZacharoulisDuncan SpaldingMadhava PaiLong R JiaoKai-Wen HuangPublished in: Cancers (2018)
Liver cancer is the sixth most common cancer and third most common cause of cancer-related mortality. Presently, indications for liver resections for liver cancers are widening, but the response is varied owing to the multitude of factors including excess intraoperative bleeding, increased blood transfusion requirement, post-hepatectomy liver failure and morbidity. The advent of the radiofrequency energy-based bipolar device Habib™-4X has made bloodless hepatic resection possible. The radiofrequency-generated coagulative necrosis on normal liver parenchyma provides a firm underpinning for the bloodless liver resection. This meta-analysis was undertaken to analyse the available data on the clinical effectiveness or outcomes of liver resection with Habib™-4X in comparison to the clamp-crush technique. The RF-assisted device Habib™-4X is considered a safe and feasible modality for liver resection compared to the clamp-crush technique owing to the multitude of benefits and mounting clinical evidence supporting its role as a superior liver resection device. The most intriguing advantage of the RF-device is its ability to induce systemic and local immunomodulatory changes that further expand the boundaries of survival outcomes following liver resection.
Keyphrases
- systematic review
- liver failure
- randomized controlled trial
- hepatitis b virus
- type diabetes
- cardiovascular events
- cardiovascular disease
- bipolar disorder
- young adults
- adipose tissue
- ultrasound guided
- machine learning
- liver metastases
- coronary artery disease
- optical coherence tomography
- case control
- glycemic control
- clinical evaluation