Login / Signup

Comparison of the clinical performance and usefulness of five SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests.

Mitsuru WakitaMayumi IdeiKaori SaitoYuki HoriuchiKotoko YamataniSuzuka IshikawaTakamasa YamamotoGene IgawaMasanobu HinataKatsuhiko KadotaTaro KurosawaSho TakahashiTakumi SaitoShigeki MisawaChihiro AkazawaToshio NaitoTakashi MiidaKazuhisa TakahashiTomohiko AiYoko Tabe
Published in: PloS one (2021)
We examined the usefulness of five COVID-19 antibody detection tests using 114 serum samples at various time points from 34 Japanese COVID-19 patients. We examined Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 from Roche, and four immunochromatography tests from Hangzhou Laihe Biotech, Artron Laboratories, Chil, and Nadal. In the first week after onset, Elecsys had 40% positivity in Group S (severe cases) but was negative in Group M (mild-moderate cases). The immunochromatography kits showed 40-60% and 0-8% positivity in Groups S and M, respectively. In the second week, Elecsys showed 75% and 50% positivity, and the immunochromatography tests showed 5-80% and 50-75% positivity in Groups S and M, respectively. After the third week, Elecsys showed 100% positivity in both groups. The immunochromatography kits showed 100% positivity in Group S. In Group M, positivity decreased to 50% for Chil and 75-89% for Artron and Lyher. Elecsys and immunochromatography kits had 91-100% specificity. Elecsys had comparable chronological change of cut-off index values in the two groups from the second week to the sixth week. The current SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection tests do not provide meaningful interpretation of severity and infection status. Its use might be limited to short-term epidemiological studies.
Keyphrases
  • sars cov
  • respiratory syndrome coronavirus
  • coronavirus disease
  • placebo controlled
  • randomized controlled trial
  • early onset
  • label free
  • real time pcr