Reduced-dose direct oral anticoagulants in the extended treatment of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background Extended-duration anticoagulation is beneficial for preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE). Reduced-dose direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may be preferable if they preserve efficacy and cause less bleeding. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of trials comparing reduced-dose DOACs with full-dose DOACs and aspirin or placebo in the extended phase of VTE treatment. Methods A literature search was conducted by use of the MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases, supplemented by hand-searching. One thousand three hundred and ninety-nine titles were screened, with data from accepted studies being extracted by two independent reviewers. Major outcomes analyzed included recurrent VTE and major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding events, presented as risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Two trials met the prespecified inclusion criteria. Data from 5847 patients were analyzed for efficacy outcomes, and from 5842 patients for safety outcomes. Reduced-dose DOACs were as effective as full-dose treatment in preventing recurrent VTE at 1 year (RR 1.12 [95% CI 0.67-1.87]), and more effective than aspirin or placebo (RR 0.26 [95% CI 0.14-0.46]). Rates of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding events were similar between patients receiving reduced-dose DOACs and and those receiving aspirin or placebo (RR 1.19 [95% CI 0.81-1.77]). There was a trend towards less bleeding when reduced-dose and full-dose DOACs were compared (RR 0.74 [95% CI 0.52-1.05]). Conclusions Extended-duration treatment of VTE with reduced-dose DOACs may be as efficacious as full-dose treatment, with rates of major bleeding being similar to those in patients receiving treatment with aspirin or placebo, but further long-term studies are needed.