HPV as a Carcinomic Driver in Head and Neck Cancer: a De-escalated Future?
James E BatesConor E SteuerPublished in: Current treatment options in oncology (2022)
Patients with HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma have improved prognosis relatively to those with tumors not driven by HPV. Both definitive radiotherapy (typically with concurrent chemotherapy) and transoral robotic surgery (with adjuvant therapies based on pathologic risk factors) are both acceptable treatment options for patients. The decision on which treatment is optimal depends on individual patient factors and should be made in a multi-disciplinary setting with input from a radiation oncologist, head and neck surgeon, and medical oncologist. Where appropriate, patients in this setting should be considered for enrollment on clinical studies evaluating de-escalation of treatment intensity given the very favorable outcomes and high toxicity profile associated with conventional therapies. However, caution is needed given negative data for de-escalation in the definitive chemotherapy and radiation setting. It remains unclear what the prognostic significance of HPV status is in patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck outside of the oropharynx.
Keyphrases
- locally advanced
- squamous cell carcinoma
- end stage renal disease
- high grade
- ejection fraction
- risk factors
- chronic kidney disease
- newly diagnosed
- rectal cancer
- early stage
- radiation therapy
- peritoneal dialysis
- neoadjuvant chemotherapy
- type diabetes
- squamous cell
- prognostic factors
- patient reported outcomes
- randomized controlled trial
- open label
- clinical trial
- metabolic syndrome
- big data
- machine learning
- patient reported
- skeletal muscle
- replacement therapy
- current status