Ability of Primary Care Health Databases to Assess Medicinal Products Discussed by the European Union Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee.
Robert W V FlynnKarin HedenmalmTarita Murray-ThomasAlexandra C PacurariuPeter ArlettHilary ShepherdPuja MylesXavier KurzPublished in: Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics (2020)
This study measured the exposure to different categories of medicinal products discussed by the European Union (EU) Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee from September to November 2018 in four electronic primary care health databases: IQVIA Medical Research Data-UK, IQVIA Medical Research Data-France, IQVIA Medical Research Data-Germany, and Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum, in the entire lifespan of each database until August 31, 2018. The assessment of 83 centrally authorized products and 45 nationally authorized products showed that coverage was better for products marketed for longer duration and worse for orphan drugs. The ability to detect associations against hypothetical comparators was better for more common events and for larger effect sizes. Coverage of advanced therapies was worse for those typically administered in a specialized rather than primary care setting. This study shows that to enable better informed regulatory decisions there is a need to access complementary data sources, particularly capturing secondary care prescribing.
Keyphrases
- primary care
- healthcare
- risk assessment
- big data
- electronic health record
- adverse drug
- public health
- clinical practice
- palliative care
- human health
- mental health
- general practice
- artificial intelligence
- health information
- transcription factor
- machine learning
- data analysis
- emergency department
- drinking water
- cross sectional
- quality improvement
- climate change
- deep learning
- health insurance
- chronic pain