A Framework for Extension Studies Using Real-World Data to Examine Long-Term Safety and Effectiveness.
Mehmet BurcuCyntia B Manzano-SalgadoAnne M ButlerJennifer B ChristianPublished in: Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science (2021)
Understanding the long-term benefits and risks of treatments, devices, and vaccines is critically important for individual- and population-level healthcare decision-making. Extension studies, or 'roll-over studies,' are studies that allow for patients participating in a parent clinical trial to 'roll-over' into a subsequent related study to continue to observe and measure long-term safety, tolerability, and/or effectiveness. These designs are not new and are often used as an approach to satisfy regulatory post-approval safety requirements. However, designs using traditional clinical trial infrastructure can be expensive and burdensome to conduct, particularly, when following patients for many years post trial completion. Given the increasing availability and access of real-world data (RWD) sources, direct-to-patient technologies, and novel real-world study designs, there are more cost-efficient approaches to conducting extension studies while assessing important long-term outcomes. Here, we describe various fit-for-purpose design options for extension studies, discuss related methodological considerations, and provide scientific and operational guidance on practices when planning to conduct an extension study using RWD. This manuscript is endorsed by the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology (ISPE).
Keyphrases
- clinical trial
- healthcare
- end stage renal disease
- case control
- ejection fraction
- newly diagnosed
- randomized controlled trial
- chronic kidney disease
- systematic review
- peritoneal dialysis
- primary care
- decision making
- electronic health record
- machine learning
- phase ii
- double blind
- drinking water
- case report
- artificial intelligence