Login / Signup

The Minimal Clinically Important Difference Changes Greatly Based on the Different Calculation Methods.

Marco FranceschiniAngelo BoffaElettra PignottiLuca AndrioloStefano ZaffagniniGiuseppe Filardo
Published in: The American journal of sports medicine (2023)
This study proved that different MCID calculation methods lead to highly heterogeneous values, which significantly affect the percentage of patients achieving the MCID in a given population. The wide-ranging thresholds obtained with the different methodologies make it difficult to evaluate the real effectiveness of a given treatment questioning the usefulness of MCID, as currently available, in the clinical research.
Keyphrases
  • end stage renal disease
  • ejection fraction
  • newly diagnosed
  • randomized controlled trial
  • chronic kidney disease
  • systematic review
  • peritoneal dialysis
  • patient reported outcomes