Login / Signup

Weak evidence on nalmefene creates dilemmas for clinicians and poses questions for regulators and researchers.

Niamh FitzgeraldKathryn AngusAndrew EldersMarisa de AndradeDuncan RaistrickNick HeatherJim McCambridge
Published in: Addiction (Abingdon, England) (2016)
Problems with the registration, design, analysis and reporting of clinical trials of nalmefene did not prevent it being licensed and recommended for treating alcohol dependence. This creates dilemmas for primary care clinicians and commissioning organisations where nalmefene has been heavily promoted, and poses wider questions about the effectiveness of the medicines regulation system and how to develop the alcohol treatment evidence base.
Keyphrases
  • primary care
  • clinical trial
  • palliative care
  • mental health
  • randomized controlled trial
  • alcohol consumption
  • systematic review
  • transcription factor
  • emergency department
  • general practice
  • open label