Minimal clinically important difference in Alzheimer's disease: Rapid review.
Ryan T MuirMichael D HillSandra E BlackEric Edward SmithPublished in: Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association (2024)
This systematic rapid review identified thresholds for minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for recently used Alzheimer's disease (AD) trial endpoints: Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog), Clinical Dementia Rating scale sum of boxes (CDR-SB), integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). MCIDs were higher for more severe stages of AD. Average treatment effects in recent trials of anti-amyloid disease modifying monoclonal antibodies are lower than previously published MCIDs. In future trials of disease modifying treatments for AD, the proportion of participants in each treatment group that experienced a clinically meaningful decline could be reported. More work is needed to incorporate the values and preferences of patients and care partners in deriving MCIDs.
Keyphrases
- cognitive decline
- mild cognitive impairment
- healthcare
- clinical trial
- newly diagnosed
- end stage renal disease
- randomized controlled trial
- palliative care
- early onset
- study protocol
- mental health
- prognostic factors
- chronic pain
- hepatitis c virus
- pain management
- replacement therapy
- combination therapy
- sensitive detection
- human immunodeficiency virus
- health insurance
- men who have sex with men
- drug induced
- affordable care act
- open label
- meta analyses