Robot-assisted surgery in thoracic and visceral indications: an updated systematic review.
Nicole Grössmann-WaniekMichaela RiegelneggLucia GassnerClaudia WildPublished in: Surgical endoscopy (2024)
In summary, conclusive assertions on RAS superiority are impeded by inconsistent and insufficient low-quality evidence across various outcomes and procedures. While RAS may offer potential advantages in some surgical areas, healthcare decisions should also take into account the limited quality of evidence, financial implications, and environmental factors. Furthermore, considerations should extend to the ergonomic aspects for maintaining a healthy surgical environment.
Keyphrases
- robot assisted
- minimally invasive
- systematic review
- healthcare
- meta analyses
- quality improvement
- spinal cord
- coronary artery bypass
- insulin resistance
- type diabetes
- randomized controlled trial
- adipose tissue
- human health
- surgical site infection
- spinal cord injury
- young adults
- climate change
- skeletal muscle
- atrial fibrillation
- affordable care act