Login / Signup

Discordance Rate and Risk Factor of Other Diagnostic Modalities for Small Bowel Tumors Detected by Device-Assisted Enteroscopy: A Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Disease (KASID) Multicenter Study.

Jihye ParkJin Su KimSung Noh HongKwangwoo NamSeong Eun KimEui Sun JeongJae Hyun KimSeong-Ran Jeon
Published in: Gut and liver (2024)
For small bowel tumors, the discrepancy rate between DAE and CT was 6.2%, and 26.5% between DAE and VCE. Despite developments in cross-sectional imaging (VCE and DAE modalities), discrepancies still exist. For small bowel bleeding that require significant transfusion while showing insignificant VCE findings, DAE should be considered as the next diagnostic approach, considering the possibility of missed small bowel tumor.
Keyphrases
  • small bowel
  • cross sectional
  • risk factors
  • computed tomography
  • high resolution
  • atrial fibrillation
  • image quality
  • positron emission tomography
  • magnetic resonance
  • sickle cell disease