On Factors Affecting Subharmonic-aided Pressure Estimation (SHAPE).
Ipshita GuptaJohn R EisenbreyPriscilla MachadoMaria StanczakKirk WallaceFlemming ForsbergPublished in: Ultrasonic imaging (2018)
Subharmonic-aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) estimates hydrostatic pressure using the inverse relationship with subharmonic amplitude variations of ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs). We studied the impact of varying incident acoustic outputs (IAO), UCA concentration, and hematocrit on SHAPE. A Logiq 9 scanner with a 4C curvilinear probe (GE, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) was used with Sonazoid (GE Healthcare, Oslo, Norway) transmitting at 2.5 MHz and receiving at 1.25 MHz. An improved IAO selection algorithm provided improved correlations ( r from -0.85 to -0.95 vs. -0.39 to -0.98). There was no significant change in SHAPE gradient as the pressure increased from 10 to 40 mmHg and hematocrit concentration was tripled from 1.8 to 4.5 mL/L (Δ0.00-0.01 dB, p = 0.18), and as UCA concentration was increased from 0.2 to 1.2 mL/L (Δ0.02-0.05 dB, p = 0.75). The results for the correlation between the SHAPE gradient and hematocrit values for patients ( N = 100) in an ongoing clinical trial were also calculated showing a poor correlation value of 0.14. Overall, the SHAPE gradient is independent of hematocrit and UCA concentration. An improved algorithm for IAO selection will make SHAPE more accurate.
Keyphrases
- healthcare
- clinical trial
- machine learning
- magnetic resonance imaging
- magnetic resonance
- type diabetes
- deep learning
- randomized controlled trial
- ejection fraction
- study protocol
- high resolution
- prognostic factors
- quantum dots
- computed tomography
- mass spectrometry
- health insurance
- patient reported outcomes
- single molecule