"Mn 3 AlN" is Really Mn 4 N.
Shaun O'DonnellSharad MahataraStephan LanySage R BauersRebecca W SmahaJames R NeilsonPublished in: Inorganic chemistry (2024)
We investigate the synthesis of antiperovskite "Mn 3 AlN" using the published synthesis procedure, as well as several new reaction pathways. In each case, only a combination of antiperovskite Mn 4 N and Mn 5 Al 8 or precursors is obtained. The identity of the obtained antiperovskite phase is unambiguously determined to be Mn 4 N via synchrotron powder X-ray diffraction (SPXRD), X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), and magnetometry. The experimental results are further supported by thermochemical calculations informed by density functional theory (DFT), which find Mn 3 AlN to be metastable versus decomposition into Mn and AlN. The DFT-based calculations also predict an antiferromagnetic ground state for Mn 3 AlN. This directly contradicts the previously reported ferromagnetic behavior of "Mn 3 AlN". Instead, the observed magnetic behavior is consistent with ferrimagnetic Mn 4 N. We examine the data in the original publication and conclude that the compound reported to be Mn 3 AlN is in fact Mn 4 N.
Keyphrases
- room temperature
- density functional theory
- transition metal
- metal organic framework
- molecular dynamics
- high resolution
- systematic review
- randomized controlled trial
- molecular dynamics simulations
- computed tomography
- minimally invasive
- ionic liquid
- electronic health record
- molecular docking
- electron microscopy
- tandem mass spectrometry