High class filtering facepiece (FFP) are fundamental and effective in protection of emergency health care workers: an observational cohort study in a German community.
Martin LierStefan NesslerChristine StadelmannMeike PresslerLeif SaagerOnnen MoererMarkus RoesslerKonrad MeissnerMartin S WinklerPublished in: Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine (2021)
The period in which contact to SARS-CoV-2 positive patients has been possible was 10 months (March to December 2020)-with 54,681 patient contacts documented for EMS-either emergencies (n = 33,241) or transportation services (n = 21,440). Seven hundred-thirty (n = 730) participants were included into the study (n = EMS: 325, HS: 322 and NPC: 83). The analysis of the survey showed that the exposure to patients with an unknown and consecutive positive SARS-CoV-2 result was significantly higher for EMS when compared to HS (EMS 55% vs. HS 30%, p = 0.01). The incidence of a SARS-CoV-2 infection in our cohort was 1.2% (EMS), 2.2% (HS) and 2.4% (NPC) within the three groups (ns) and lowest in EMS. Furthermore, the belief of previous COVID-19 was significant higher in EMS (19% vs. 10%), CONCLUSION: The consistent use of FFP2/N95 in EMS is able to prevent work-related SARS-CoV-2 infections in emergency situations. The significance of physical airway protection in exposed medical staff is still relevant especially under the aspect of new viral variants and unclear effectiveness of new vaccines.
Keyphrases
- sars cov
- emergency medical
- respiratory syndrome coronavirus
- healthcare
- public health
- mental health
- emergency department
- randomized controlled trial
- systematic review
- coronavirus disease
- end stage renal disease
- newly diagnosed
- ejection fraction
- primary care
- risk factors
- prognostic factors
- physical activity
- copy number
- long term care